Best Shared Inbox Software and Tools in 2026: 10 Ranked
Alexandra Swan, GrowthUpdated October 6, 2026
Most comparisons of shared inbox software have a curious feature in common: they do not cite a single source. They assert that shared mailboxes "break down at scale" without telling you where that number comes from, and they blend help desks in with shared inboxes as if they were the same purchase.
This one cites Microsoft's and Google's own documentation for every limit. If your problem is too much email, InboxPilot (we make it) sorts and drafts replies inside Gmail or Outlook. If it is two people answering the same customer, Front, Hiver or Help Scout add assignment, and two or three people should try the free Google or Microsoft 365 shared mailbox first.
This page is the cross-platform comparison. If your platform is already decided, two companion guides go deeper than this one can:
- Gmail shared inbox and shared mailbox tools, if you are staying in Google Workspace.
- Best shared inbox for Outlook, if your team is on Microsoft 365.
Start here: which of the three are you actually buying?
Almost every bad purchase in this category comes from confusing three different products.
| Class | What it gives you | What it does not | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plain shared mailbox | Several people can open one mailbox. Free. | No assignment, no collision detection, no reporting | M365 shared mailbox, Google's native shared inbox, Google Groups Collaborative Inbox |
| Shared inbox tool | Assignment, collision detection, internal notes, light reporting. Still feels like email. | Deep ticketing, CSAT, portals | Front, Hiver, Gmelius, Missive |
| Help desk | Tickets, queues, macros, SLAs, CSAT, deep analytics | The feeling that you are still using email | Zendesk, Freshdesk (Help Scout straddles) |
Work out which class you are in before you compare a single feature. If you are torn between the last two rows, our shared inbox vs help desk guide walks through the signs and the costs. A three-person team does not need Zendesk. A 30-agent org cannot run on a Google Group.
Team inbox software is the same purchase under another name
"Team inbox software" and "shared inbox tools" describe the middle row of that table: one address, several people, and coordination layered on top. Vendors use the two names interchangeably, and so do buyers. If a product page calls itself a team inbox, check which class it really belongs to. Some are shared inbox tools, some are help desks with an email channel, and a few are plain shared mailboxes with a new label.
For a team of two to ten, the questions that separate team inbox tools are short. Does it run inside Gmail or Outlook, or in a separate app everyone has to open? Does it tell you when a colleague is already replying? And what does the plan you need cost at your real headcount? The rest of this guide answers those three for every tool listed.
The free options first, because you may not need to buy anything
Every listicle in this category skips straight to the paid tools. Two free options are worth ruling out first, and one of them is new enough that the competing articles have not noticed it.
Google's native shared inbox is new, free, and undocumented in every comparison we found
Google Workspace admins can now create a shared email address directly from the Admin console (Users, then "Set up a shared email address"). Unlike the old Collaborative Inbox, it lives in real Gmail, not the Google Groups web interface. It is included on Business Starter, Standard, and Plus with no paid add-on. (Google Workspace admin docs)
It gives you access and sending from the shared address. It gives you no collision detection, no automation, and no SLA reporting. It solves access, not coordination. But if your problem is "three of us need to see support@," it is free and it is enough.
If everyone only needs a copy of what arrives, you may not need a shared inbox at all: a Google Group gives the team one address, and our guide to creating a group email in Gmail covers it. The Gmail shared inbox guide has step-by-step setup for all three free Google options.
Microsoft tells you exactly where its shared mailbox breaks
This is the best-sourced fact in this entire post, and it comes from Microsoft's own admin documentation:
"A shared mailbox supports a maximum of 25 users. If too many users access the mailbox at the same time, they might experience connection failures or duplicated messages." (Microsoft Learn, About shared mailboxes)
Duplicated messages. Two agents answering the same customer. That is the platform vendor naming the failure mode in its own docs, which is considerably more persuasive than a shared inbox company telling you that shared mailboxes are bad.
The other documented M365 limits are worth knowing before you rely on one:
- 50 GB cap without an Exchange Online Plan 2 license. On hitting it, the mailbox stops sending, then stops receiving.
- No encryption. Mail from a shared mailbox cannot be encrypted, because the mailbox has no security context of its own.
- You cannot prevent users from deleting messages.
- No external access. A contractor on an outside domain cannot be given access.
Gmail has a concurrency ceiling too
Google's native shared inbox is built on Gmail delegation, and delegation has documented limits: up to 1,000 delegates on paper, but only around 40 can access the account simultaneously under typical use, and Google notes that "above-average use by one or more delegates might reduce this number." Browser extensions and APIs that poll Gmail frequently reduce it further. (Google Workspace admin docs)
That last detail is worth sitting with, because Hiver and Gmelius are both Gmail extensions.
A plain shared mailbox is genuinely fine at two or three people and low volume. The vendor-documented ceilings are 25 users (Microsoft) and roughly 40 concurrent delegates (Google). But the real breaking point arrives much earlier, the first time two people reply to the same customer and neither knows it happened.
How we evaluated these tools
Every tool was judged on the same five questions, in this order:
- Where it runs. Inside Gmail or Outlook, or as a separate app the team has to switch to.
- Platform coverage. Native in Gmail, native in Outlook, connected to one or both, or unsupported.
- Coordination. Assignment, collision detection, and internal notes, and whether they live in the mailbox or somewhere else.
- Real cost. The plan a five-person team actually needs, at list price, billed annually, not the advertised entry tier.
- What breaks first. Documented limits from the vendor or the platform, cited where they exist.
Prices come from each vendor's own pricing page, checked on October 6, 2026. Platform limits come from Microsoft's and Google's administrator documentation, linked inline. We did not run paid trials of every tool, so this guide does not score speed or support quality.
Shared inbox tools compared
| Tool | Best for | Where it lives | Gmail | Outlook | Entry price | Free tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| InboxPilot | Best overall (AI email layer) | Inside both | Native | Native | $39/mo, AI drafts included | 7-day trial |
| Front | Classic shared inbox | Separate app | Connects | Connects (sync caveats) | $25/seat/mo; $45 with Copilot AI drafts | No |
| Hiver | Gmail teams | Inside Gmail | Native | Via Omni only | $25/user/mo annual, AI drafts included | No (7-day trial) |
| Missive | Collaboration | Separate app | Connects | Connects | $14/user/mo, no AI drafts; $24 plus AI usage | Undocumented |
| Help Scout | Support teams | Separate app | Connects | Connects | $25/user/mo; $45 for AI Drafts | Yes, 5 users |
| Gmelius | Gmail-only teams | Inside Gmail | Native | No | $25/user/mo annual, AI drafts included | No |
| Zendesk | Outgrown the category | Separate app | Connects | Connects | $19/agent (Support), $55 (Suite); $165 with Copilot | No |
| Freshdesk | Budget ticketing | Separate app | Connects | Connects | $19/agent/mo annual; $84 with Freddy AI Copilot | No (14-day trial) |
| Google native shared inbox | Free, Workspace | Inside Gmail | Native | No | $0 | Free |
| M365 shared mailbox | Free, Microsoft | Inside Outlook | No | Native | $0 | Free |
Prices checked on each vendor's pricing page on October 6, 2026.
Which tools cut the most admin work on a shared mailbox
Admin overhead on a shared mailbox is the work around the replies: sorting and labeling, deciding who owns each email, spotting two people on the same thread, retyping the same answers, and chasing what nobody picked up. Shared inbox tools organise that work. An AI layer removes some of it before anyone sees it.
| Admin chore | Plain shared mailbox | Shared inbox tool (Front, Hiver, Missive) | InboxPilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sorting and labeling | By hand, or Outlook and Gmail rules | Rules, tags and assignment | Every email sorted and labeled by AI |
| Retyping repeat answers | By hand | Saved templates or macros | Drafts written from your documents, approved by a person |
| Who owns it, and two people on one thread | Nobody knows | Assignment and collision detection | Taken and closed in Slack with 👀 and ✅ |
| Related emails split across threads | Search by hand | Merge by hand | Grouped into one case automatically |
| Logging requests to a spreadsheet | Copy and paste | Integrations | Rows added to Google Sheets |
Ranked by how much of that work disappears rather than gets divided, the order is: an AI drafting layer first, then a shared inbox tool, then a help desk, then a plain shared mailbox. Front and Hiver remove the "who is replying" problem best inside the mailbox, and our email routing software comparison shows how each tool decides who gets an email. InboxPilot removes the most typing and sorting, because the reply is already drafted when someone opens the email.
InboxPilot can also send auto-replies for the questions you choose and run workflows, such as labeling every invoice or logging every quote request to a sheet. It connects to a Gmail or Outlook mailbox, a Microsoft 365 shared mailbox included, through the account of someone with Full Access to it (there it drafts and never auto-sends). If most of your overhead is coordination between several people rather than volume, pair it with one of the shared inbox tools below or read shared inbox vs help desk first.
Internal comments your customers never see
Every shared inbox tool here keeps internal comments on the conversation but out of the reply, so the customer only ever receives what you send. The difference is where the discussion happens: beside the email, in the draft itself, or in your team chat.
| Tool | Where the team discusses an email | Customer sees it |
|---|---|---|
| InboxPilot | A Slack thread under the email, with the AI draft as its first message | No |
| Front | Comments and @mentions in the conversation | No |
| Hiver | Notes and @mentions in the Gmail sidebar | No |
| Missive | Chat inside the thread, plus a shared live draft | No |
| Help Scout | Notes in the conversation | No |
| Plain shared mailbox | Forwarding the email to a colleague, or a separate chat | Risk of reply-all |
InboxPilot posts each matching email to a Slack channel. Your team talks it through in the thread, and a reply such as "offer a partial refund, mention the new tracking number" rewrites the draft before anyone approves it. Nothing in the thread reaches the customer; only the approved reply is sent from Gmail or Outlook. The limit is that the discussion lives in Slack, not in a sidebar inside the mailbox, so teams that don't use Slack should look at Front or Hiver.
On a plain Microsoft 365 or Gmail shared mailbox there is no private comment layer. Teams forward the email internally, which is how a note meant for a colleague ends up in a reply to the customer.
The 10 best shared inbox tools, ranked
1. InboxPilot
This is the pick for teams whose real problem is volume, and for anyone who wants relief without leaving Gmail or Outlook. InboxPilot takes the top spot for one reason: every other tool on this list helps humans divide the work faster. InboxPilot reduces how much work reaches humans at all. It is the AI layer inside the Gmail or Outlook inbox your team already shares: it sorts each email and drafts the reply from your own documents, and your team keeps whatever it already uses to divide up the work.
Strengths
- Native in both Gmail and Outlook, which no other Gmail-native tool here manages (Gmelius is Gmail-only, Hiver needs a separate product for Outlook).
- AI drafts grounded in your own docs, help center, and connected tools like Shopify, Notion, and Pipedrive.
- Smart triage, auto-labeling, and plain-English email workflows.
- Priced per plan, with no per-seat fees, AI drafting included, and unlimited team members from Business up.
- No migration. It layers onto the Gmail or Outlook mailbox you already have.
- Slack integration. Matching emails post to a channel with the reply already drafted, thread replies change that draft, and 👀 / ✅ track who has each one (how it works).
Tradeoff: who has which customer is tracked in Slack (take it, close it, chase what nobody took) rather than with assignments inside Gmail or Outlook, and in a Microsoft 365 shared mailbox it drafts but never sends on its own.
Every plan starts with a 7-day free trial. Starter is $39 a month with one team member, Growth $99 with up to five team members, Business $249 with three inboxes and unlimited team members, and Scale $499 with ten inboxes. AI drafting is included on every plan, and yearly billing gives two months free. (InboxPilot pricing and plans)
It makes the most sense if your team answers one Gmail or Outlook address and wants relief without a migration, or if you run Front or Hiver and want the repetitive volume deflected before it reaches a human. It pairs with any shared inbox below, and for a lot of teams it removes the reason to buy one.
2. Front
Front is the most complete classic shared inbox in this category, aimed at mid-market and larger teams that want serious integrations, analytics and omnichannel alongside the shared mailbox. If your diagnosis is coordination rather than volume, this is the tool to beat.
In Front, you assign a conversation to one teammate, who then owns it until it's archived or reassigned. Internal comments and @mentions sit in the same conversation as the email but never go to the customer. Shared drafts let a teammate edit your reply before it's sent. (Front help center)
Strengths
- Mature collision detection and assignment, the two things you are actually buying.
- Deep integration catalog including Salesforce and HubSpot.
- Strong analytics, genuinely better than the rest of this list.
- Omnichannel on Professional and above.
Tradeoffs
- The advertised price is not the real price. Starter at $25 per seat is limited to a single channel type. The plan most teams actually need is Professional at $65 per seat per month, and Enterprise is $105.
- Outlook sync is conditional, and Front documents this itself. Read status syncs only for personal channels, and for shared conversations only once the assignee reads it. In-place archive mailboxes do not sync at all. Mixed Front and Outlook teams get confused by this. (Front help docs)
- AI is an add-on: Copilot, which drafts replies, is $20 per seat per month, so Starter with drafts is $45 and Professional $85. Autopilot runs from $0.05 per conversation.
Starter is $25 per seat per month billed annually and capped at 10 seats, Professional $65, Enterprise $105. No free tier, 14-day trial. (front.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026)
Already on Front and weighing a move? Front alternatives maps what replaces its assignment, comments and shared drafts, priced for a five-person team.
3. Hiver
Hiver is for Google Workspace teams who will not leave Gmail, and should not have to. It runs inside Gmail as an extension, so there is almost nothing to onboard.
Strengths
- Genuinely native to Gmail, running as a sidebar. Onboarding is close to zero because there is no new app to learn.
- Collision detection, assignment, and SLA basics.
- Clean pricing ladder: $25, $55, $85, and Growth already includes AI Copilot, which drafts replies.
Tradeoffs
- Performance is the recurring complaint. Reviewers on G2 and Capterra consistently report slow loading under volume and needing to refresh the browser to bring Hiver back.
- Outlook is not supported in the Gmail product. Microsoft teams have to use Hiver Omni, which is a separate standalone app, not an Outlook add-in.
- Analytics are thinner than a full help desk.
No free plan: a 7-day trial of Elite, then Growth at $25 per user per month billed annually ($35 monthly), Pro $55, Elite $85, from a 2-seat minimum (hiverhq.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026).
4. Missive
Missive is for teams that want to discuss and co-write replies inside the thread instead of copying them into Slack.
Strengths
- Cheapest serious entry point at $14 per user per month.
- Real-time collaborative drafting is genuinely differentiated. Two people can write one reply together, live.
- Broad channel support: Gmail, Outlook, IMAP, WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, SMS via Twilio.
- Provider-agnostic, so it does not care whether you are on Google or Microsoft.
Tradeoffs
- Starter caps at 5 users and has no AI drafts. The realistic plan for a growing team is Productive at $24. AI usage is billed on top, through Missive credits or your own OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini key (Missive docs).
- The learning curve is the dominant reviewer complaint. It is a genuinely new paradigm, and teams coming from plain Gmail need a few weeks to settle in.
- Occasional duplicate-thread and snooze confusion reported by reviewers.
Starter is $14 per user per month for up to 5 users, Productive $24 for up to 50, Business $36 with no cap. A free plan is referenced but its limits are not published, so confirm before relying on it. (missiveapp.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026)
5. Help Scout
Help Scout suits customer support teams that want a shared inbox plus a knowledge base, without Zendesk's weight.
Strengths
- Free tier with 5 users, one inbox, and one Docs site.
- The cleanest, easiest interface of any support tool here.
- Built-in knowledge base, so you are not buying a second product.
- AI Answers is priced per resolution ($0.75) rather than per seat, which is buyer-friendly.
Tradeoffs
- Reporting is basic compared to Zendesk or Freshdesk, and custom report history is gated to higher tiers. This is the most consistent reviewer theme.
- Workflow customization feels restrictive once your needs get complex.
- Extra inboxes cost $10 per month each, and Pro requires a 10-user minimum.
- No native voice or WhatsApp.
Free covers 5 users and one inbox. Standard is $25 per user per month billed yearly, Plus $45, Pro $75. AI Drafts start on Plus, since Standard has only AI Assist for editing what you write. (helpscout.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026)
6. Gmelius
Gmelius is for small Google Workspace teams that want a shared inbox plus Kanban boards, at the lowest Gmail-native price.
Strengths
- Cheapest true Gmail-native entry at $19 per user per month.
- Kanban and Trello-style boards on top of email, which is an unusual and genuinely useful combination.
- Shared labels, internal notes, and sequences.
Tradeoffs
- Gmail only. No Outlook, at all. One Outlook user on your team disqualifies this tool entirely. Confirmed on Gmelius's own pricing page.
- Speed complaints are persistent. Reviewers repeatedly report slow Gmail load times with the extension active, and Chrome extension bugs.
- The mobile app is the most-cited weak point.
- No free tier, and only a 7-day trial, which is not long enough to roll a shared inbox out to a team.
Shared inboxes start on Growth at $25 per user per month billed annually ($33 monthly), and Pro is $40. The AI Draft Assistant comes with every plan. The $19 Meli plan is a personal AI assistant without shared inboxes (gmelius.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026).
7. Zendesk
Zendesk is on this list so you can rule it in or out honestly. It is not a shared inbox. It is a ticketing suite, and that is a different purchase, for teams that have outgrown this category entirely and need a real help desk.
Strengths
- The deepest routing, reporting, and automation available anywhere here.
- Enormous app ecosystem.
- Scales to genuine enterprise volume.
Tradeoffs
- The $19 Support Team tier is a trap for this buyer. Anything resembling the suite starts at $55 per agent (Suite Team), and Professional is $115.
- Complexity and admin burden are the dominant reviewer criticisms. Setup takes real planning.
- Email stops feeling like email and becomes tickets. That is the entire point, and also the entire cost.
Support Team is $19 per agent per month billed annually. Suite Team is $55 and Suite Professional $115, with no free tier. Copilot, which drafts replies, adds $50 an agent and needs Professional or higher, so AI drafts start at $165 an agent. (zendesk.com/pricing, checked October 6, 2026)
8. Freshdesk
Freshdesk is the budget route to real ticketing, for teams that can live with rough edges.
Strengths
- Aggressive pricing at $19 per agent per month.
- Solid knowledge base and customer portal.
Tradeoffs
- There is no free plan any more. The pricing page now offers only a 14-day trial of the Enterprise plan, checked 2026-09-23. Many roundups still describe the old free plan.
- Duplicate and child ticket handling is a specific, recurring reviewer complaint: child tickets get treated as new tickets, and agents end up creating duplicates.
- Reporting is limited on lower tiers.
No free plan, only a 14-day trial. Growth is $19 per agent per month billed annually, Pro $55, Enterprise $89. Freddy AI Copilot, which drafts replies, is $29 an agent more on Pro or Enterprise only, so drafts start at $84 an agent. (freshworks.com/freshdesk/pricing, checked October 6, 2026)
9. Google's native shared inbox (new in 2026)
This suits Google Workspace teams that want a shared address in real Gmail, for free, and do not yet need coordination features.
Strengths
- Free on Business Starter, Standard, and Plus, with no add-on.
- Lives in actual Gmail, unlike the old Collaborative Inbox, which lived in the Google Groups interface and never appeared in the Gmail mobile app.
- Sends from the shared address, with a "sent by" attribution you can hide.
Tradeoffs
- No collision detection, no automation, no SLA reporting. It solves access, not coordination.
- Inherits Gmail's delegation ceilings (roughly 40 concurrent delegates, reduced further by extensions).
- Rolling out in phases, so it may not be in your Admin console yet.
It costs $0, included with Workspace. (Google Workspace admin docs)
10. Microsoft 365 shared mailbox
This suits Microsoft shops with a low-volume info@ or reception@ address and a handful of people on it.
Strengths
- Free. No license required on the mailbox itself.
- Native in Outlook desktop, web, and mobile. Automapping means it simply appears.
- Includes a shared calendar.
Tradeoffs
- 25-user maximum, with "connection failures or duplicated messages" beyond it, per Microsoft's own docs.
- 50 GB hard stop without an Exchange Online Plan 2 license.
- No encryption, no way to prevent deletion, no external users.
- No assignment, no collision detection, no reporting.
It costs $0. (Microsoft Learn)
What a 5-person team actually pays in year one
Advertised entry prices are misleading, so here is the real number for a five-person support team, at list price, billed annually.
| Tool | Plan needed for 5 people | Monthly | Year one |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google native shared inbox | Included with Workspace | $0 | $0 |
| M365 shared mailbox | Included | $0 | $0 |
| Hiver | Growth at $25, AI drafts included | $125 | $1,500 |
| Missive | Starter $14 (caps at exactly 5), no AI drafts; Productive $24 plus AI usage | $70; $120 plus usage | $840; $1,440 plus usage |
| Gmelius | Growth $25, AI drafts included | $125 | $1,500 |
| Help Scout | Free (5 users) or Standard $25; Plus $45 for AI Drafts | $0 to $125; $225 | $0 to $1,500; $2,700 |
| InboxPilot | Growth, annual, AI drafts included | $82.50 | $990 |
| Front | Starter $25, single channel; $45 with Copilot AI drafts | $125; $225 | $1,500; $2,700 |
| Front (Professional, realistic) | $65; $85 with Copilot | $325; $425 | $3,900; $5,100 |
| Zendesk Suite Team | $55; Copilot needs Professional, $165 with it | $275; $825 | $3,300; $9,900 |
Two things stand out. Front's real cost is closer to $3,900 than the $1,500 its entry tier implies, and $5,100 once Copilot drafts replies. And InboxPilot's price does not grow with headcount: Growth covers five team members for $990 a year, drafting included, and Business covers unlimited team members.
What to look for in shared inbox software
1. Rule out free first
If you are two or three people, Google's native shared inbox or the M365 shared mailbox may be enough. Spending $1,500 a year to solve a problem you do not have yet is the most common mistake in this category.
2. Check Outlook support before anything else
Gmelius does not support Outlook. Hiver's Gmail product does not either. If any meaningful part of your team is on Microsoft, that removes options before you compare a single feature.
3. Price the plan you will actually need
Front's $25 Starter is single-channel. Zendesk's $19 is not the Suite. Missive's $14 Starter caps at five users. Build the number from the plan you will really be on, at the headcount you will really have.
Per-seat prices usually leave AI drafting out: Front, Help Scout, Missive, Zendesk and Freshdesk all charge more for it, while InboxPilot's plan price includes it.
4. Ask what breaks at 3x volume
Every tool here works at low volume. Ask each vendor what fails first when volume triples: rule caps, load times, reporting depth, or the AI meter.
5. Separate the volume problem from the coordination problem
These are different problems with different solutions. Collision detection fixes coordination. It does nothing about volume. AI drafting fixes volume. It does nothing about coordination. Diagnose which one is actually hurting before you shop.
Shared inboxes for schools and universities
At colleges and universities, admissions, the registrar, financial aid and IT help desks all run on shared addresses, and they have three quirks worth checking before you buy:
- Check the account type first. Google documents its Admin console shared inbox for Business Starter, Standard and Plus, not Education editions, so ask your Workspace admin whether it is available to you. A Google Groups Collaborative Inbox works on school accounts.
- Price for the peak, not the average. Admissions deadlines and the start of term bring far more email than a quiet month. Per-seat tools charge for every temporary staffer you add; volume-priced tools charge for the extra mail instead. Work out which one your busiest month costs.
- Ask about student data. Messages to these offices carry student records, so ask each vendor where email is stored, how long it is kept, and whether it is used to train AI models.
Most admissions and registrar mail is the same questions: deadlines, entry requirements, fees and which documents to send. InboxPilot drafts those replies for education and certification programs from your prospectus and policy documents, and by default a staff member approves each one before it sends.
How to choose, in one paragraph
Start with the diagnosis, not the tool. If the answer is that nobody is stepping on anyone's toes, there is just too much email, that is a volume problem and InboxPilot is our pick, on its own or alongside whichever shared inbox you land on. If you are two or three people on Workspace, try Google's native shared inbox and spend nothing. If you are a Gmail team who wants real coordination, Hiver is the lowest-friction upgrade, from $25 a seat. If you want the most complete classic shared inbox and can pay for it, it is Front, at its real price rather than its advertised one. If you want a support-shaped tool with a knowledge base, Help Scout. And if your team is on Microsoft, cross Gmelius off the list.
Related reading
- Gmail shared inbox and shared mailbox tools and best shared inbox for Outlook: the platform-specific versions of this guide.
- Best email management software: 11 tools for support teams: the wider category, including help desks.
- How to automate email support: what to automate once your inbox is organized.
- RFQ and quote request automation: how quote requests get read, priced, and answered from your own catalog.
- Shared mailbox auto-reply: the documented limits of native auto-replies on a shared address.
- Front alternatives: leaving Front, and what each option costs for five seats.
- Gmail ticketing system: five ways to track customer email, from free labels to help desks.
- Best email routing software for teams: round robin, load balancing and AI routing, tool by tool.
- Shared inbox vs help desk: the signs you have outgrown shared email, and what each costs a small team.
- How to add a shared mailbox in Outlook: the free Microsoft 365 option, set up in every version of Outlook.
- How to create a group email in Gmail: contact labels and Google Groups, when a team only needs a shared address.
Prices checked against vendor pricing pages on October 6, 2026, and stated per user per month unless noted. Platform limits are cited from Microsoft and Google's own administrator documentation. Vendors change pricing frequently, so confirm current rates before purchasing.
Questions
What is the best shared email inbox in 2026?
For teams whose real issue is email volume rather than coordination, InboxPilot, which we make, is the pick: it sorts and drafts replies inside Gmail or Outlook. For classic coordination features like assignment and collision detection, Front is the most complete product, though the plan most teams need is $65 per seat, or $85 with Copilot AI drafts, rather than the advertised $25. Gmail teams who want the lowest-friction upgrade should look at Hiver, which works inside Gmail from $25 a seat with AI drafts included. Teams of two or three should try the free Google or Microsoft 365 shared mailbox before buying anything.
What is shared inbox software?
Shared inbox software lets several people work one email address, like support@ or sales@, with assignment, collision detection, internal notes, and reporting layered on top. It sits between a plain shared mailbox, which offers access but no coordination, and a help desk, which converts email into tickets.
Is a shared mailbox in Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace good enough?
For two or three people at low volume, usually yes, and it is free. Microsoft's own documentation states a shared mailbox supports a maximum of 25 users and warns that beyond that, users may see connection failures or duplicated messages. In practice teams hit coordination problems long before that ceiling, as soon as they need to know who is replying to what.
Does Google have a native shared inbox?
Yes. Google Workspace admins can now create a shared email address from the Admin console under Users, and it appears inside real Gmail rather than the Google Groups interface. It is included on Business Starter, Standard, and Plus at no extra cost. It provides access and sending, but no collision detection, no automation, and no SLA reporting.
How much does shared inbox software cost in 2026?
Seats start at $14 to $25 a month, but AI reply drafts often cost more. With drafts, Hiver and Gmelius stay at $25, Help Scout needs Plus at $45, Front $45 with Copilot and Missive $24 plus usage. InboxPilot, which we make, includes drafting: Starter is $39 a month.
Which shared inbox tools work with Outlook?
Front, Missive, Help Scout, Zendesk and Freshdesk all connect to Outlook as separate applications. Gmelius does not support Outlook at all and is Gmail-only. Hiver runs natively inside Gmail, with Outlook covered only through its separate Omni product. InboxPilot, the AI layer that sorts and drafts inside the mailbox itself, works natively in both Gmail and Outlook.
What is the difference between a shared inbox and a help desk?
A shared inbox keeps the conversation feeling like email and adds coordination on top. A help desk converts each email into a ticket with queues, macros, portals, and CSAT, which gives you deeper reporting but stops feeling like email. Choose the help desk when you need SLAs and analytics, not before.
Share this article
Article by
Samih Sghier is the founder of InboxPilot, for operational teams that run their business from their inbox. Quotes, orders, documents and customer email land in Gmail or Outlook. InboxPilot drafts each reply from the company's own records and waits for a person to approve the send. He wrote the first line of code in July 2024 and still writes most of it. He writes about AI drafting, email workflows and the integrations behind them.
LinkedInReplies drafted before anyone looks.
InboxPilot sorts your inbox and drafts replies for you to approve.